Roiver Score™ for
AAPLApple Inc.
Based on the annual report for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2025.
Apple Inc. (AAPL) scores 58/100 (Solid) on the Roiver Score, a transparent quality composite, based on its annual report for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2025. Its strongest area is profitability; its weakest is valuation. The score measures business quality, not timing — it's a signal, not a recommendation.
No black box
Roiver Score is a transparent 0–100 quality composite. Five components, each scored 0–20. If one can't be measured from a company's filings, the score is scaled from the ones that can (at least three are required). Banks, insurers and REITs are scored on measures suited to them. Inspired by Piotroski's F-Score, Altman's Z-Score, and the Buffett/Munger framework on quality compounders at fair prices. Read the full methodology →
Frequently asked about AAPL
What is AAPL's Roiver Score?
Apple Inc. scores 58 out of 100 (Solid). Based on the annual report for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2025.
How is the Roiver Score for AAPL calculated?
It combines profitability, capital structure, cash quality, valuation and stability into a transparent 0–100 composite. Five components, each scored 0–20. If one can't be measured from a company's filings, the score is scaled from the ones that can (at least three are required). The full methodology is published.
Is AAPL a good quality stock?
On quality, AAPL rates "Solid" (58/100). Its strongest driver is profitability and its weakest is valuation. Quality is one input to a decision, not a buy/sell call.
Embed on your site
Drop this iframe into a Substack, blog post, or notion page. Updates automatically as fundamentals change.
<iframe src="https://roiver.com/embed/score/AAPL" width="640" height="280" frameborder="0" style="border:0;border-radius:16px;overflow:hidden" loading="lazy"></iframe>
Get AAPL's Score in your inbox
A free weekly digest of quality scores and what changed. No account needed.
Educational use only. Roiver Score is a quality signal, not a recommendation.